Portal Home > Knowledgebase > Articles Database > APC or Eaccselator or Xcache

APC or Eaccselator or Xcache

Posted by mixmox, 11-25-2010, 05:53 AM
hello what is the difference between them and on which server should we use them. like download and upload center (very high load server) on shared hosting service on single dedicated with only 1 0r 2 website on static or dynamic server - web server like html website / php.asp website TNX

Posted by CoderJosh, 11-26-2010, 11:39 PM
All these three are PHP opcode caches, so they won't be of any help for a static website, or for a dynamic website that isn't driven by PHP.

Posted by mixmox, 11-27-2010, 01:16 AM
how about php web page ? on shared hosting that host many php webpage and cms and a spesial webserver which host only one vbulletin or nuke cms

Posted by mixmox, 11-29-2010, 06:17 AM
no other idea ?

Posted by jlkinsel, 11-29-2010, 03:42 PM
mixmox - Not to be vague, but I think when you'll need these systems, you'll know it. What they do is take an existing php site and decrease the computing power needed to serve a page. This results in a website that responds faster and can handle more traffic as the CPU is not as busy. I've used APC on Drupal sites in the past and gained a good performance increase (sorry, don't have statistics handy). If you are running a web server with shared hosting, I suspect these might be handy for you. For non-dynamic pages, I'm fond of using the varnish web cache.

Posted by UnixCabin, 11-29-2010, 07:35 PM
Dose those opcode cacher work properly with suphp?

Posted by Jamson, 11-29-2010, 08:23 PM
None of them do.

Posted by mixmox, 11-30-2010, 03:13 AM
what you mean ?

Was this answer helpful?

Add to Favourites Add to Favourites    Print this Article Print this Article

Also Read
Jailshell a user (Views: 304)
How much do u make? (Views: 285)